ABSTRACT
Objective:This paper aims to explore the management of human genetic resources in medical institutions, according to reflections of the management mode of a particular hospital, providing possible reference for other medical institutions.Methods:The management system of human genetic resources was constructed refer to the McKinsey 7S model. Approved projects information includes the types of projects, characteristics of human genetic resources involved and the characteristics of principal investigator are analyzed.Results:A total number of 82 projects were approved Since the implementation of newly updated Regulation of the People′s Republic of China on the Administration of Human Genetic Resources (hereinafter referred to as the regulations), and majority of which are drug clinical trials. The human genetic resources materials and data involved are mainly blood, urine, serum, plasma, clinical data, imaging data, etc. Most of the principal investigators with senior professional title are from key disciplines.Conclusions:McKinsey 7S model provides a new reference path for medical institutions to carry out human genetic resources management.
ABSTRACT
Based on the project data and SCI output data of 5431 projects supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) in oncology from 2008 to 2012,this paper took advantage of the Web of Science database,studied the number of papers published and the citations per paper of different research fields in oncology,different subcategories of projects,top 20 institutions funded by NSFC.Based on the study findings,we tried to make some suggestions for the funding agency,researchers,as well as research management personnel for increase the effectiveness of funding use,improve the administration work and policy-making concerns.
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the research achievements and their outcome influence factors of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) funding projects in Peking University Cancer Hospital during the "Twelfth Five-Year Plan".Methods Based on project data and outcomes of 68 projects supported by NSFC from 2011 to 2015,this paper studies the number of SCI papers,Chinese Journal papers and conference papers published,the citations per paper and talent cultivation of different subcategories of projects,as well as different professional titles,academic degrees,genders,ages,occupations of the principle investigator,and component of project team members.Results 90％ of the 68 projects published SCI papers,basically completed the intended research objectives set in the application.41.7％ of the SCI papers were published in the 1-5 year after the project closure.Research team collaborated between clinical and scientific research staff has higher output.Conclusions Scientific research management department should strengthen the process management and the tracking of project achievements,and should promote the combination of basic and clinical research to achieve mutually complementary.
ABSTRACT
The National Natural Science Foundation of China is one of the most important fund channels for basic research in Peking University Cancer Hospital (hereinafter referred to as our hospital).Peer review was used for application review.In this article,the feedback opinions of applications from 2010 to 2014 for our hospital were categorized,summarized and analyzed.The common reasons of failure and corresponding measures were put forward to provide references for the applicants and scientific research managers for formulating relevant plicies.
ABSTRACT
Research integrity leads the social credit system.for researchers in large hospitals in China,the pressure from clinical work and temptations caused by research outcomes sometimes lead to scientific dishonesty.Strengthening the construction of scientific ethics and maintaining social prestige of science has become an important task for research community in our country.This paper analyzed the causes of scientific dishonesty and explored the ways to improve research integrity in large hospitals,including providing education and training in research ethics,and establishing and strengthening the regulations in research ethics.